DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alfa Romeo 145 vs 2000 Chevrolet Corsa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 145

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeChevrolet
145ModelCorsa
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
195 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower92 HP
144 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank46 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4095 mmLength3730 mm
1710 mmWidth1610 mm
1430 mmHeight1390 mm
1185 KgWeight975 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2445 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alfa Romeo 145 and 2000 Chevrolet Corsa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…