DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 145

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeAlfa Romeo
146Model145
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
197 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
144 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank51 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60R14HTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4235 mmLength4095 mm
1712 mmWidth1710 mm
1426 mmHeight1430 mm
1190 KgWeight1185 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Alfa Romeo 146 and 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…