DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chevrolet Corsa vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 145

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeAlfa Romeo
CorsaModel145
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
177 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
92 HPPower120 HP
127 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3730 mmLength4095 mm
1610 mmWidth1710 mm
1390 mmHeight1430 mm
975 KgWeight1185 Kg
2445 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chevrolet Corsa and 2000 Alfa Romeo 145 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…