DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Xedos 6 vs 1996 Audi Cabriolet Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Xedos 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeAudi
Xedos 6ModelCabriolet
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
214 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
144 HPPower115 HP
170 NmTorque165 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4560 mmLength4366 mm
1700 mmWidth1716 mm
1355 mmHeight1379 mm
1190 KgWeight1350 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2556 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Xedos 6 and 1996 Audi Cabriolet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Xedos 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…