DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda Accord vs 1996 Mazda Xedos 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Accord

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMazda
AccordModelXedos 6
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
198 km/hTop speed214 km/h
2155 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower144 HP
198 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4560 mm
1780 mmWidth1700 mm
1425 mmHeight1355 mm
1385 KgWeight1190 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda Accord and 1996 Mazda Xedos 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Accord leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…