DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi Cabriolet vs 1996 Mazda Xedos 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Xedos 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMazda
CabrioletModelXedos 6
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
187 km/hTop speed214 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
115 HPPower144 HP
165 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4560 mm
1716 mmWidth1700 mm
1379 mmHeight1355 mm
1350 KgWeight1190 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi Cabriolet and 1996 Mazda Xedos 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Xedos 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…