DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda Tribute vs 2011 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

73.75–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChevrolet
TributeModelCaptiva
2011Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
240 HPPower258 HP
302 NmTorque288 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption15,5 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/70 R16Tyre size235/50 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4442 mmLength4673 mm
—Width1849 mm
1783 mmHeight1756 mm
1540 KgWeight1815-1920 Kg
2619 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda Tribute and 2011 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…