DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2011 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

74.25–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMazda
CaptivaModelTribute
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
258 HPPower240 HP
288 NmTorque302 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank66 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R19Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4442 mm
1849 mmWidth—
1756 mmHeight1783 mm
1815-1920 KgWeight1540 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Chevrolet Captiva and 2011 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…