DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Nissan Navara vs 2011 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Navara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMazda
NavaraModelTribute
2011Model year2011
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2991 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
231 HPPower240 HP
550 NmTorque302 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank66 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7Gears6
255/65 R17; 255/60 R18Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5222 mmLength4442 mm
1848 mmWidth—
1795 mmHeight1783 mm
2110 KgWeight1540 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Nissan Navara and 2011 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Navara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…