2011 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 3.0i V6 (240 Hp) 2011Overall Score73.75/100
2011 Mazda Tribute vs 2011 Nissan Navara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Nissan
Navara
Nissan Navara 3.0 V6 (231 Hp) 2011Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Navara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda TributeSpecificationNissan Navara
MazdaMakeNissan
TributeModelNavara
2011Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda TributeSpecificationNissan Navara
—0–100 km/h9,3 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2991 cc
240 HPPower231 HP
302 NmTorque550 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda TributeSpecificationNissan Navara
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption12,7 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda TributeSpecificationNissan Navara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7
235/70 R16Tyre size255/65 R17; 255/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda TributeSpecificationNissan Navara
4442 mmLength5222 mm
—Width1848 mm
1783 mmHeight1795 mm
1540 KgWeight2110 Kg
2619 mmWheelbase3200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Mazda Tribute and 2011 Nissan Navara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Navara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…