2011 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 2.5i (171 Hp) 2011Overall Score68.5/100
2011 Mazda Tribute vs 2010 Volvo XC70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 2.4 D DRIVe (175 Hp) 2010Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Mazda Tribute
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda TributeSpecificationVolvo XC70
MazdaMakeVolvo
TributeModelXC70
2011Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda TributeSpecificationVolvo XC70
—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
171 HPPower175 HP
232 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda TributeSpecificationVolvo XC70
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda TributeSpecificationVolvo XC70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
235/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda TributeSpecificationVolvo XC70
4442 mmLength4838 mm
—Width1861 mm
1783 mmHeight1604 mm
1484 KgWeight1742 Kg
2619 mmWheelbase2815 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Mazda Tribute and 2010 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…