DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Jeep Compass vs 2011 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMazda
CompassModelTribute
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,90 s0–100 km/h—
201 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
163 HPPower171 HP
320 NmTorque232 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank66 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/60 R17Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4448 mmLength4442 mm
1812 mmWidth—
1718 mmHeight1783 mm
1680 KgWeight1484 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Jeep Compass and 2011 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…