DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo XC70 vs 2011 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMazda
XC70ModelTribute
2010Model year2011
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
175 HPPower171 HP
420 NmTorque232 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength4442 mm
1861 mmWidth—
1604 mmHeight1783 mm
1742 KgWeight1484 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo XC70 and 2011 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…