DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda Tribute vs 2004 Isuzu Rodeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeIsuzu
TributeModelRodeo
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h—
171 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
153 HPPower131 HP
200 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank59 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
10,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R16 99 STyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4277 mm
1800 mmWidth1814 mm
1710 mmHeight1704 mm
1455 KgWeight1690 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda Tribute and 2004 Isuzu Rodeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…