DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs 2004 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeMazda
RodeoModelTribute
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed171 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
131 HPPower153 HP
195 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size215/70 R16 99 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4277 mmLength4395 mm
1814 mmWidth1800 mm
1704 mmHeight1710 mm
1690 KgWeight1455 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Isuzu Rodeo and 2004 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…