DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Oldsmobile Alero vs 2004 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeMazda
AleroModelTribute
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
200 km/hTop speed171 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
141 HPPower153 HP
203 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank61 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R15Tyre size215/70 R16 99 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4395 mm
1780 mmWidth1800 mm
1385 mmHeight1710 mm
1370 KgWeight1455 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Oldsmobile Alero and 2004 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…