DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Tribute vs 2003 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda TributeSpecificationMG ZS
MazdaMakeMG
TributeModelZS
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda TributeSpecificationMG ZS
13,7 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
166 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1989 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
124 HPPower117 HP
175 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda TributeSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda TributeSpecificationMG ZS
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R16 99 STyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda TributeSpecificationMG ZS
4395 mmLength4520 mm
1800 mmWidth1700 mm
1710 mmHeight1390 mm
1495 KgWeight1125 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Tribute and 2003 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…