DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GAZ 31 vs 2003 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda Tribute
GAZMakeMazda
31ModelTribute
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda Tribute
15,3 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
155 km/hTop speed166 km/h
2134 ccEngine displacement1989 cc
110 HPPower124 HP
250 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda Tribute
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda Tribute
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size215/70 R16 99 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda Tribute
4870 mmLength4395 mm
1800 mmWidth1800 mm
1422 mmHeight1710 mm
1560 KgWeight1495 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GAZ 31 and 2003 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…