DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationMazda Tribute
MGMakeMazda
ZSModelTribute
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationMazda Tribute
9,0 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
19 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1989 cc
117 HPPower124 HP
160 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationMazda Tribute
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank57 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationMazda Tribute
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size215/70 R16 99 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationMazda Tribute
4520 mmLength4395 mm
1700 mmWidth1800 mm
1390 mmHeight1710 mm
1125 KgWeight1495 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…