DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Tribute vs 2003 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda TributeSpecificationGAZ 31
MazdaMakeGAZ
TributeModel31
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda TributeSpecificationGAZ 31
13,7 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
166 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1989 ccEngine displacement2134 cc
124 HPPower110 HP
175 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda TributeSpecificationGAZ 31
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
57 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda TributeSpecificationGAZ 31
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R16 99 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda TributeSpecificationGAZ 31
4395 mmLength4870 mm
1800 mmWidth1800 mm
1710 mmHeight1422 mm
1495 KgWeight1560 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Tribute and 2003 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…