DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Tribute vs 2003 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
TributeModelC5
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
166 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1989 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
124 HPPower90 HP
175 NmTorque236 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
57 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R16 99 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4618 mm
1800 mmWidth1770 mm
1710 mmHeight1476 mm
1495 KgWeight1360 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Tribute and 2003 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…