DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mercury Sable vs 2000 Mazda Sentia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Sentia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeMazda
SableModelSentia
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
203 HPPower205 HP
271 NmTorque272 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption18 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 93 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5070 mmLength4895 mm
1850 mmWidth1795 mm
1410 mmHeight1420 mm
1545 KgWeight1600 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mercury Sable and 2000 Mazda Sentia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Sentia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…