1999 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 24V (203 Hp) 1999Overall Score73.5/100
1999 Ford Taurus vs 2000 Mazda Sentia Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Sentia
Mazda Sentia 3.0 i V6 24V (205 Hp) 2000Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Sentia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationMazda Sentia
FordMakeMazda
TaurusModelSentia
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationMazda Sentia
210 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
203 HPPower205 HP
271 NmTorque272 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationMazda Sentia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption18 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationMazda Sentia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 93 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationMazda Sentia
5070 mmLength4895 mm
1854 mmWidth1795 mm
1463 mmHeight1420 mm
1602 KgWeight1600 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Ford Taurus and 2000 Mazda Sentia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Sentia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…