2000 • Mazda
Sentia
Mazda Sentia 3.0 i V6 24V (205 Hp) 2000Overall Score74.5/100
2000 Mazda Sentia vs 1999 Ford Taurus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 24V (203 Hp) 1999Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Sentia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda SentiaSpecificationFord Taurus
MazdaMakeFord
SentiaModelTaurus
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda SentiaSpecificationFord Taurus
220 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
205 HPPower203 HP
272 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda SentiaSpecificationFord Taurus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
18 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda SentiaSpecificationFord Taurus
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15 93 HTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda SentiaSpecificationFord Taurus
4895 mmLength5070 mm
1795 mmWidth1854 mm
1420 mmHeight1463 mm
1600 KgWeight1602 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2756 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Sentia and 1999 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Sentia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…