2000 • Mazda
Sentia
Mazda Sentia 3.0 i V6 18V (160 Hp) 2000Overall Score71.5/100
2000 Mazda Sentia vs 2000 Ford Escape Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Escape
Ford Escape 3.0 i V6 24V XLT (203 Hp) 2000Overall Score72.25/100
WINNER
Ford Escape
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.5–72.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda SentiaSpecificationFord Escape
MazdaMakeFord
SentiaModelEscape
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda SentiaSpecificationFord Escape
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2954 ccEngine displacement2976 cc
160 HPPower203 HP
250 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda SentiaSpecificationFord Escape
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
16 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda SentiaSpecificationFord Escape
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15 93 HTyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda SentiaSpecificationFord Escape
4895 mmLength4394 mm
1795 mmWidth1780 mm
1420 mmHeight1702 mm
1530 KgWeight1505 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2619 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Sentia and 2000 Ford Escape approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Escape leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…