2000 • Saab
9-5
Saab 9-5 3.0 i V6 24V (200 Hp) 2000Overall Score70.75/100
2000 Saab 9-5 vs 2000 Mazda Sentia Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Sentia
Mazda Sentia 3.0 i V6 18V (160 Hp) 2000Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Sentia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-5SpecificationMazda Sentia
SaabMakeMazda
9-5ModelSentia
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Saab 9-5SpecificationMazda Sentia
8,0 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2962 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
200 HPPower160 HP
310 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-5SpecificationMazda Sentia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
16,3 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-5SpecificationMazda Sentia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R 15; 215/55 R 16Tyre size205/65 R15 93 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-5SpecificationMazda Sentia
4805 mmLength4895 mm
1792 mmWidth1795 mm
1449 mmHeight1420 mm
1630 KgWeight1530 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Saab 9-5 and 2000 Mazda Sentia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Sentia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…