DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Nissan Gloria vs 2000 Mazda Sentia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Sentia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMazda
GloriaModelSentia
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
160 HPPower160 HP
248 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15 HTyre size205/65 R15 93 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4895 mm
1720 mmWidth1795 mm
1425 mmHeight1420 mm
1510 KgWeight1530 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Nissan Gloria and 2000 Mazda Sentia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Sentia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…