DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Scrum vs 1999 Daihatsu Terios Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Scrum

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeDaihatsu
ScrumModelTerios
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

130 km/hTop speed135 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement659 cc
58 HPPower60 HP
86 NmTorque84 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
3Gears5
145/80 R12 STyre size175/80 R15 S
YesABS—

Dimensions

3295 mmLength3395 mm
1395 mmWidth1475 mm
1870 mmHeight1675 mm
810 KgWeight960 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase2420 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Scrum and 1999 Daihatsu Terios approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…