1999 • Mazda
Laputa
Mazda Laputa 0.7 i 12V 2WD Turbo (60 Hp) 1999Overall Score51.5/100
1999 Mazda Laputa vs 2000 Mazda Scrum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V Turbo (58 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda LaputaSpecificationMazda Scrum
MazdaMakeMazda
LaputaModelScrum
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda LaputaSpecificationMazda Scrum
0 km/hTop speed130 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement657 cc
60 HPPower58 HP
83 NmTorque86 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda LaputaSpecificationMazda Scrum
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank37 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda LaputaSpecificationMazda Scrum
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears3
165/70 R14 81 STyre size145/80 R12 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda LaputaSpecificationMazda Scrum
3355 mmLength3295 mm
1475 mmWidth1395 mm
1550 mmHeight1870 mm
810 KgWeight810 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mazda Laputa and 2000 Mazda Scrum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…