DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Daihatsu Terios vs 2000 Mazda Scrum Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Scrum

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaihatsuMakeMazda
TeriosModelScrum
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

135 km/hTop speed130 km/h
659 ccEngine displacement657 cc
60 HPPower58 HP
84 NmTorque86 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank37 lt
10 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears3
175/80 R15 STyre size145/80 R12 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3295 mm
1475 mmWidth1395 mm
1675 mmHeight1870 mm
960 KgWeight810 Kg
2420 mmWheelbase1840 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Daihatsu Terios and 2000 Mazda Scrum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…