DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda RX-7 vs 2000 Caterham Seven Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda RX-7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.25–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCaterham
RX-7ModelSeven
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

5,3 s0–100 km/h4,1 s
250 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1308 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
239 HPPower193 HP
294 NmTorque203 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank90 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4285 mmLength3380 mm
1760 mmWidth1580 mm
1230 mmHeight1120 mm
1280 KgWeight—
2465 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda RX-7 and 2000 Caterham Seven approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda RX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…