2000 • Caterham
Seven
Caterham Seven Super 1.8 i 16V (193 Hp) 2000Overall Score71.5/100
2000 Caterham Seven vs 2000 Mazda RX-7 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
RX-7
Mazda RX-7 RX 2000Overall Score72.25/100
WINNER
Mazda RX-7
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.5–72.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda RX-7
CaterhamMakeMazda
SevenModelRX-7
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats2+2
2Doors2
Performance
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda RX-7
4,1 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
225 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1308 cc
193 HPPower239 HP
203 NmTorque294 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda RX-7
PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank76 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda RX-7
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda RX-7
3380 mmLength4285 mm
1580 mmWidth1760 mm
1120 mmHeight1230 mm
—Weight1280 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2465 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Caterham Seven and 2000 Mazda RX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda RX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…