DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mazda RX-8 vs 2000 Mazda RX-7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda RX-7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–72.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
RX-8ModelRX-7
2005Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

6,5 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
240 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1308 ccEngine displacement1308 cc
240 HPPower239 HP
216 NmTorque294 Nm
2Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank76 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
245/45 R18Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4285 mm
1770 mmWidth1760 mm
1340 mmHeight1230 mm
1330 KgWeight1280 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mazda RX-8 and 2000 Mazda RX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda RX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…