DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda RX-7 vs 2005 Mazda RX-8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda RX-7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.25–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
RX-7ModelRX-8
2000Model year2005
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats4
2Doors4

Performance

5,3 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
250 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1308 ccEngine displacement1308 cc
239 HPPower240 HP
294 NmTorque216 Nm
—Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4285 mmLength4435 mm
1760 mmWidth1770 mm
1230 mmHeight1340 mm
1280 KgWeight1330 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda RX-7 and 2005 Mazda RX-8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda RX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…