DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda Roadster vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolvo
RoadsterModelS40
2012Model year2012
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
170 HPPower150 HP
189 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/50 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4476 mm
1720 mmWidth1770 mm
1245 mmHeight1454 mm
—Weight1498 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda Roadster and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…