2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score64.75/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Mazda Roadster Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
Roadster
Mazda Roadster 2.0 i (170 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Roadster
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda Roadster
VolvoMakeMazda
S40ModelRoadster
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda Roadster
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower170 HP
350 NmTorque189 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda Roadster
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda Roadster
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationMazda Roadster
4476 mmLength3995 mm
1770 mmWidth1720 mm
1454 mmHeight1245 mm
1498 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Mazda Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…