DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Mazda Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMazda
C30ModelRoadster
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower170 HP
350 NmTorque189 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4266 mmLength3995 mm
1782 mmWidth1720 mm
1447 mmHeight1245 mm
1450 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Mazda Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…