2000 • Mazda
Roadster
Mazda Roadster 1.6 i (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mazda Roadster vs 2000 Volkswagen Golf Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volkswagen
Golf
Volkswagen Golf 1.8 4motion (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Golf
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
MazdaMakeVolkswagen
RoadsterModelGolf
2000Model year2000
RoadsterBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
142 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
3955 mmLength4149 mm
1680 mmWidth1735 mm
1235 mmHeight1439 mm
1010 KgWeight1270 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2518 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Roadster and 2000 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Golf leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…