2000 • Caterham
Seven
Caterham Seven Super 1.8 i 16V (124 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Caterham Seven vs 2000 Mazda Roadster Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Roadster
Mazda Roadster 1.6 i (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Caterham Seven
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda Roadster
CaterhamMakeMazda
SevenModelRoadster
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeRoadster
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda Roadster
5,9 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
124 HPPower125 HP
165 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda Roadster
PetrolFuel typePetrol
36 ltFuel tank48 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda Roadster
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda Roadster
3380 mmLength3955 mm
1580 mmWidth1680 mm
1120 mmHeight1235 mm
550 KgWeight1010 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2265 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Caterham Seven and 2000 Mazda Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Caterham Seven leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…