DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Audi A3 vs 2000 Mazda Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMazda
A3ModelRoadster
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
3/5Doors2

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h—
189 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
102 HPPower125 HP
148 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank48 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4152 mmLength3955 mm
1735 mmWidth1680 mm
1427 mmHeight1235 mm
1090 KgWeight1010 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Audi A3 and 2000 Mazda Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…