DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Roadster vs 2000 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeAudi
RoadsterModelA3
2000Model year2000
RoadsterBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed189 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
125 HPPower102 HP
142 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4152 mm
1680 mmWidth1735 mm
1235 mmHeight1427 mm
1010 KgWeight1090 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Roadster and 2000 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…