DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Protege vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 147

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeAlfa Romeo
ProtegeModel147
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
135 HPPower115 HP
157 NmTorque275 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R 15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4170 mm
1695 mmWidth1729 mm
1420 mmHeight1439 mm
—Weight1345 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Protege and 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 147 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…