DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z3 vs 2003 Mazda Protege Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Protege

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda Protege
BMWMakeMazda
Z3ModelProtege
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda Protege
10,4 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
118 HPPower135 HP
190 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda Protege
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda Protege
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
225/50 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationMazda Protege
4050 mmLength4200 mm
1740 mmWidth1695 mm
1288 mmHeight1420 mm
1220 KgWeight—
2446 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z3 and 2003 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Protege leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…