DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Protege vs 2003 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda ProtegeSpecificationMG ZT
MazdaMakeMG
ProtegeModelZT
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda ProtegeSpecificationMG ZT
—0–100 km/h11,6 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
135 HPPower160 HP
157 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda ProtegeSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda ProtegeSpecificationMG ZT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size215/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda ProtegeSpecificationMG ZT
4200 mmLength4740 mm
1695 mmWidth1780 mm
1420 mmHeight1410 mm
—Weight1440 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Protege and 2003 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…