DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda Protege vs 2002 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Protege

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
ProtegeModelFreelander
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
135 HPPower117 HP
157 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4368 mm
1695 mmWidth1809 mm
1420 mmHeight1708 mm
—Weight1510 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda Protege and 2002 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Protege leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…