DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Freelander vs 2002 Mazda Protege Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Protege

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
FreelanderModelProtege
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
117 HPPower135 HP
160 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4200 mm
1809 mmWidth1695 mm
1708 mmHeight1420 mm
1510 KgWeight—
2557 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Freelander and 2002 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Protege leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…