DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZR vs 2002 Mazda Protege Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationMazda Protege
MGMakeMazda
ZRModelProtege
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationMazda Protege
10,0 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
113 HPPower135 HP
260 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationMazda Protege
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationMazda Protege
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/50 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationMazda Protege
4011 mmLength4200 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1420 mm
1155 KgWeight—
2502 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZR and 2002 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…