DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-6 vs 2000 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo V40
MazdaMakeVolvo
MX-6ModelV40
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeEstate
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo V40
10,4 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
204 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
170 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo V40
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size195/60 R15; 205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-6SpecificationVolvo V40
4615 mmLength4516 mm
1750 mmWidth1716 mm
1310 mmHeight1425 mm
1120 KgWeight1320 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-6 and 2000 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…