DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Mazda MX-6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationMazda MX-6
MazdaMakeMazda
626ModelMX-6
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationMazda MX-6
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
198 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
170 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationMazda MX-6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationMazda MX-6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 88 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationMazda MX-6
4574 mmLength4615 mm
1710 mmWidth1750 mm
1430 mmHeight1310 mm
1185 KgWeight1120 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…