DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-6 vs 2000 Rover 75 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-6SpecificationRover 75
MazdaMakeRover
MX-6Model75
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Mazda MX-6SpecificationRover 75
10,4 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
204 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1951 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
170 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-6SpecificationRover 75
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
8 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-6SpecificationRover 75
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-6SpecificationRover 75
4615 mmLength4747 mm
1750 mmWidth1778 mm
1310 mmHeight1424 mm
1120 KgWeight1485 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-6 and 2000 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…